|Year : 2013 | Volume
| Issue : 1 | Page : 17-20
Residual cyst with a misleading clinical and radiological appearance
Najwa Karam1, Fawzi Karam2, Ibrahim Nasseh1, Marcel Noujeim3
1 Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Imaging, Lebanese University, School of Dentistry, Beirut, USA
2 Founder and Member of the Lebanese Society of Oral Surgery, Lebanon, USA
3 Comprehensive Dentistry, Oral and Maxillofacial Radiology Graduate Program Director, University of Texas Health Science Center, San Antonio, San Antonio, Texas, USA
|Date of Web Publication||3-May-2013|
Department of Comprehensive Dentistry, Oral and Maxillofacial Radiology Graduate Program Director, University of Texas Health Science Center, San Antonio, San Antonio, Texas
Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None
A case report of a 45-year-old male who presented with a deep defect in the alveolar crest at the buccal side of the upper right 1 st molar strongly suggesting a perforation of the floor of the maxillary sinus and an oro-antral communication. Clinical signs and symptoms supported this diagnosis. After radiographic evaluation with Cone Beam Computed Tomography (CBCT), the diagnosis was shifting away from oro-antral communication. The diagnosis of a residual cyst was established after surgical exploration and removal, and histopathologic evaluation. The maxillary sinus membrane was intact.
Keywords: Cone Beam CT, jaw cyst, periapical pathology, residual cyst
|How to cite this article:|
Karam N, Karam F, Nasseh I, Noujeim M. Residual cyst with a misleading clinical and radiological appearance. J Oral Maxillofac Radiol 2013;1:17-20
|How to cite this URL:|
Karam N, Karam F, Nasseh I, Noujeim M. Residual cyst with a misleading clinical and radiological appearance. J Oral Maxillofac Radiol [serial online] 2013 [cited 2021 Mar 3];1:17-20. Available from: https://www.joomr.org/text.asp?2013/1/1/17/111347
| Introduction|| |
Residual cysts are a part of the inflammatory group of odontogenic cysts, which are one of the most common osseous-destructive lesions affecting the jaws. ,,
Inflammatory cysts are by far the most common cystic lesions in the jaws; they constitute 50 to 75% of all oral cysts, ,,, Developmental odontogenic cysts and inflammatory odontogenic cysts are characterized by slow growth and expansile tendency and despite being entities that present a benign biological behavior, they can reach considerable size if they are not diagnosed in time and treated appropriately.
Since a number of cystic lesions of the jaws share similar clinical and radiographic features, the diagnosis of odontogenic cysts usually requires a detailed analysis of clinical, radiographic and histopathologic findings. ,,,,,
| Case Report|| |
A 45-year-old mentally challenged male underwent a routine clinical examination. This examination revealed poor oral hygiene, hence several sessions of scaling and root planning were performed. A large cavity that looked like a perforation was clearly seen from the buccal side of the crest at the level of the upper right 1 st molar tooth [Figure 1].
Surprisingly, the patient was not aware neither disturbed by this problem even though a putrefying mass of food was always filling this defect. The patient's past medical history was non contributory.
|Figure 2: Cropped Panoramic image showing the radiolucency corresponding to the extraction site|
Click here to view
After discussing with his relatives, we learned that his first upper right molar tooth was extracted ten years ago. A panoramic radiograph [Figure 2] was made; it revealed a radiolucent area in the right maxillary region corresponding to the previously extracted right first molar tooth.
A CBCT volume was acquired for three reasons:
- To localize the borders/extent of the radiolucency;
- To determine the relationship between the lesion and the maxillary sinus and
- To establish a differential diagnosis.
Panoramic reconstruction [Figure 3] showed a large (2 × 4 × 3 cm), unilocular, low-density area in the right maxilla, extending horizontally from the root of the second premolar to the distal root of the second molar. The lesion was elevating the floor of the maxillary sinus with no clear interruption, the anterior aspect presented with an ill-defined margin and a remarkably sclerotic bone. A possible interruption of the floor of the maxillary sinus was noted on the posterior aspect of the lesion suggesting a direct contact between the lesion outline and the Schneiderian membrane of the maxillary sinus Cross-sectional images [Figure 4] showed elevation of the floor of the maxillary sinus without interruption. These images showed also an empty cavity surrounded by a thick soft tissue lining and sclerotic bone margin. The alveolar crest was interrupted with moderate buccal and palatal cortical expansions.
|Figure 3: A CBCT panoramic reconstruction showing the elevation of the fl oor of the maxillary sinus|
Click here to view
|Figure 4: The cross sections are showing the crest interruption and cortical expansion|
Click here to view
In the beginning of the surgery, the second premolar and the second molar were removed but since the risk of a sinus perforation existed, a separation of the roots of the second molar [Figure 5] was done to minimize the risk of fracture of the buccal plate.
During the intervention, all the measures were taken to avoid a, highly possible, oro-antral communication. The incision on the crest was slightly palatal with two mesial and distal release incisions in order to have a good exposure of the lesion and to ensure presence of bone support under the sutures.
A full thickness flap was raised, then the removal of the lesion was performed in two steps; the first using a curette, always with bone contact approach, the second, for the most posterior and internal part [Figure 6], where a dissection was done to separate the Schneiderian membrane from the lesion. This double approach was suggested by the CBCT images where the bone on the distal aspect appeared to be interrupted.
On inspection of the defect, no opening with the sinus cavity was found and the Valsalva maneuver was negative. The cavity was carefully rinsed by saline solution and the flap was sutured at the initial incisions using resorbable 4/0 sutures [Figure 7].
For the first two weeks, follow up was done every other day to inspect the wound and clean the cavity of remaining food. For the two following months, the patient was seen once a week to monitor the healing of the wound; the depression was getting shallower until reaching the same level of the crest.
Microscopic examination showed a cystic structure lined by a stratified squamous non-keratinizing coating of variable thickness. No atypical features were present. The cyst wall is fibrous and dense by polymorphic leucocytic exudates [Figure 8].
An intra-oral and a panoramic radiograph taken at 6 months after the surgery showed a full radio-opacity indicating a good healing and bone repair [Figure 9]a, b.
|Figure 9: Peri-apical (a) and panoramic (b) radiographs taken six months later; note the healing of the lesion confi rmed by the new bone formation|
Click here to view
| Discussion|| |
Residual cyst arises as consequence of an improper or incomplete surgical elimination of a radicular or other inflammatory or developmental cyst. Clinical and histological characteristics are identical to those of a radicular cyst. Radiologically it will be seen as a radiolucency of variable size at the site of a previous tooth extraction. ,
The anatomy of the maxillary sinus, especially in the area of the second premolar-first molar, increases the possibility of post-extraction oro-antral communication. This communication can be caused also by a dental infection and a subsequent radicular cyst formation, which will cause an interruption of the maxillary sinus mucosa and fast propagation of the infection within the sinus.
Oro-antral communications might have serious repercussions on all paranasal sinuses and will require a surgical treatment with intervention of an otorhinolaryngologist.
The use of CBCT in this case was crucial; the thin, superimposition-free, panoramic reconstruction and cross-section images gave a completely different perspective on the anatomy of the lesion and shifted the diagnosis from an oro-antral communication to an extra-sinus cyst that was not even interrupting the floor of the maxillary sinus; it was just displacing it superiorly.
The meticulous radiographic interpretation of the high-resolution images suggested a severe thinning of the floor of the maxillary sinus in the posterior segment; this finding was confirmed during the surgery where the surgeon had to dissect the cyst epithelium from the maxillary sinus membrane.
| References|| |
|1.||Kavita R, Smitha-Umadevi HS, Priya NS. Clinicopathological study of 100 odontogenic cysts reported at V S Dental College- A retrospective study. J Adv Oral Res 2011;2:51-8. |
|2.||Prockt AP, Schebela CR, Maito FD, Sant'Ana-Filho M, Rados PV. Odontogenic Cysts: Analysis of 680 cases in Brazil. Head Neck Pathol 2008;2:150-6. |
|3.||Meningaud JP, Oprean N, Pitak-Arnnop P, Bertrand JC. Odontogenic cysts: A clinical study of 695 cases. J Oral Sci 2006;48:59-62. |
|4.||Murmura G, Traini T, Di Iorio D, Varvara G, Orsini G, Caputi S. Residual and inflammatory radicular cysts. Clinical and pathological aspects of 2 cases. Minerva Stomatol 2004;53:693-701. |
|5.||Ochsenius G, Escobar E, Godoy L, Penafiel C. Odontogenic cysts: Analysis of 2,944 cases in Chile. Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal 2007;12:85-91. |
|6.||Sedano OH. Odontogenic cysts. Available from: http://www.dent.ucla.edu/pic/visitors/cysts/page1.html.1996. [Last accessed on 2009] |
|7.||Dimitroulis G, Curtin J. Massive residual dental cyst: Case report. Aust Dent J 1998;43:234-7 |
|8.||Oehlers FA. Periapical lesions and residual dental cysts. Br J Oral Surg 1970;8:103-13. |
[Figure 1], [Figure 2], [Figure 3], [Figure 4], [Figure 5], [Figure 6], [Figure 7], [Figure 8], [Figure 9]